![]() ![]() Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory because it seeks information from third parties and information not within its possession, custody, control, or personal knowledge.Instead, it was filed for the purpose of harassing, oppressing, embarrassing and annoying a woman who everyone agrees is a victim by seeking discovery of matters that have zero relevance to this lawsuit. Plaintiff objects to the entirety of this request because it is not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence.(Boy, you are behind the 8-ball if this is your answer but we have made this response before.) Plaintiff objects because the answer to this question may violate the defendant's protection against self-incrimination.Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory because it seeks information in the possession of, known to, or otherwise equally available to the plaintiff.Federal Rule 26(g), requires parties to consider discovery burdens and benefits before requesting discovery or responding or objecting to discovery requests and to certify that their discovery requests, responses, and objections meet the rule requirements.) (This is usually a defendant's objection, actually. Alternatively, upon request the plaintiff will provide the defendant with an estimate of what it would cost to procure and produce these documents and the parties can agree on the cost of such a production. The information or documents will be made available for review at their storage location during business hours at a mutually convenient time. Plaintiff objects because the identification, photocopying, and production of the requested documents would be oppressively burdensome and costly. ![]() ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |